Weekly Update #117
May 27, 2024
May 27, 2024
Refugees from Ukraine recorded across Europe
5,942,300
Last updated May 16 2024
Covers those granted refugee status, temporary asylum status, temporary protection, or statuses through similar national protection schemes, as well as those recorded in the country under other forms of stay
Refugees from Ukraine recorded beyond Europe
541,200
Last updated March 27 2024
Covers those granted refugee status, temporary asylum status, temporary protection, or statuses through similar national protection schemes, as well as those recorded in the country under other forms of stay
Refugees from Ukraine recorded globally
6,483,500
Last updated May 16 2024
Source: UNHCR collation of statistics made available by the authorities
HUMANITARIAN SITUATION
Civilians in Kharkiv City and Kharkivska Oblast continue to be impacted by attacks, which caused civilian deaths and injuries and damaged civilian facilities during the past days. People fleeing from the areas of active fighting in search of safety to the oblast administrative centre, Kharkiv, continued to experience insecurity there. The Humanitarian Coordinator for Ukraine, Denise Brown, condemned the repeated attacks in Kharkiv and Kharkivska Oblast, saying the people who had to leave their homes suffer new trauma coming under attack again in Kharkiv, where they arrive in search of safety.
According to the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), at least 35 civilians have been killed and 137 injured in Kharkivska Oblast since 10 May. Of those killed or injured in the northern part of the oblast, which has seen the heaviest fighting, more than half were over the age of 60, reflecting the disproportionate number of older people in border and front-line areas unable or unwilling to leave their homes even amid increased violence.
In the last four days, strikes continued to damage and destroy homes, educational establishments, shops, public transport, railway infrastructure and other civilian facilities across the oblast. Missile strikes in Kharkiv City on 23 May reportedly killed or injured over 50 civilians, according to the authorities. A printing house was hit during working hours, killing seven and injuring 21 workers and destroying equipment and warehouses with printed books, as verified by the HRMMU. Civilians were also affected in Derhachi, Liubotin and Zolochiv towns.
The Ukrainian Railways reported damage to railway infrastructure and injuries sustained by railway workers due to repeated strikes in Kharkivska Oblast.
People continued to leave areas of intense hostilities. As of 22 May, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimated that over 17,300 people had been displaced from most affected Derhachivska, Lypetska, Starosaltivska, Tsyrkunivska, Vovchanska and Zolochivska hromadas during two weeks, with 45,600 people remaining. Priority humanitarian needs for people displaced to Kharkiv City and other areas were food, hygiene products, bedding and other household supplies, according to IOM assessment.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE
During the last four days, humanitarian partners continued to provide aid to people fleeing hostilities in the northern areas of Kharkivska Oblast and responding with emergency assistance to strikes that impacted families in the city of Kharkiv and across the oblast.
During 10-24 May, almost 3,700 people who had been evacuated from Vovchanska and other affected hromadas through social transport organized by humanitarians and volunteers in coordination with local authorities were registered and received immediate aid at the transit centre in Kharkiv City. Nearly 60 per cent of them were women; more than 35 per cent of all evacuated people were aged 60 and above, and 8 per cent were children. During the same period, 3,400 people who had left the affected areas by their own means during the past two weeks and more than 3,000 people who had fled to Kharkiv from across the oblast previously were also provided with support at the transit centre. The hotline managed by the Coordination Relief Centre registered nearly 4,200 calls since 10 May and processed close to 800 requests for evacuations during this period.
As of 24 May, nearly 20 organizations were on site, with some 50 organizations involved in the evacuations and response during the past two weeks. At the transit centre, people received food, including hot meals and food packages sufficient for one person for a week; bottled water; clothes; mattresses, bedding, household appliances and other items; hygiene supplies, including for women and people with disabilities; and other assistance to support people in their everyday life. Over 1,000 people received medicines and health services at the centre during 12-24 May. More than 4,000 people were registered for multi-purpose cash assistance in two weeks.
Cash assistance was indicated as the most preferred modality of aid by recently displaced people, according to IOM findings. Since 10 May, aid organizations have provided psycho-social support to over 530 people. Some 300 people were supported with protection and legal counselling and assistance. Humanitarian partners also continue disseminating information on available protection services and identifying people at risk for specialized case management.
Since 10 May, more than 900 people have been offered accommodation in 46 collective sites in Kharkiv City and its vicinity, of them nearly 490 women and more than 410 men; nearly 70 children and over 330 older people. At collective sites, they received clothes, bedding and other household items, hygiene supplies, food and water. Medical care was made available through medical personnel, including psychologists' visits and referrals to health-care institutions. Humanitarian organizations continued to monitor living conditions and emerging needs at the collective sites to ensure an appropriate response.
Complementing the efforts of first responders, aid workers mobilized emergency support to people affected by attacks in Kharkiv City and Kharkivska Oblast. Humanitarian partners delivered materials to cover the damage to the residents whose apartments were damaged by the attacks, including distributing emergency repair materials and helping nearly 50 affected people in Zolochiv Town and some 90 people in Derhachi Town to cover the damaged windows and roofs. Aid workers also delivered materials for repair to over 70 families and provided consultations regarding the compensation for war-damaged property in Chuhuiv Town, which came under attack on 22 May.
Source: UNOCHA
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, is extremely worried about the worsening situation and resulting spike in humanitarian needs and forced displacement owing to the new ground offensive by the Russian Federation Armed Forces in the northeastern Kharkiv region of Ukraine.
At the same time, relentless aerial attacks continue, prolonging and exacerbating an already dire situation. More than two years since Russia’s full-scale invasion, regular shelling and attacks continue to claim lives and destroy homes and critical infrastructure across the country. Most recently, last week on 19 May, an air attack targeted a recreation area in Cherkaska Lozova village in Kharkiv region, killing six people and injuring at least 27.
UNHCR is concerned that conditions in Kharkiv – Ukraine’s second largest city, which is already hosting some 200,000 internally displaced people – could become even more difficult if the ground offensive and relentless aerial attacks continue. This could force many to leave Kharkiv for safety and survival, seeking protection elsewhere. Under the leadership of the UN Humanitarian Coordinator, OCHA is coordinating the development of enhanced response preparedness levels with the humanitarian clusters and lead agencies.
Last week, Kharkiv city experienced an air raid alert that lasted 16 hours non-stop. In addition, the attacks on energy infrastructure that have been impacting people across Ukraine are particularly critical in Kharkiv, where the energy supply is already well below standard capacity, affecting households, production capacity and the economy.
To ensure that UNHCR and partners can respond to the evolving situation, it is crucial that donors maintain robust and flexible funding for our humanitarian and recovery programmes. This also includes support to the winter response later this year, as the comprehensive damage to energy facilities is estimated to significantly increase the need for humanitarian assistance during the cold season.
As of end of April, UNHCR’s response in Ukraine is just 16 per cent funded from a total of $598.9 million required.
Source: OCHA
The third year of war in Ukraine has severely impacted public health. While emergency health support is crucial, it is equally important to strengthen the health system to endure ongoing adversity. Preparing for the coming winter is essential to ensure that Ukraine's health-care system remains operational amidst prolonged adversity.
Thanks to a generous donation from the Government of Germany, the WHO, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health of Ukraine (MoH), has started installing modular heating units in several hospitals prioritized by the MoH. The goal of this project is to enhance the resilience and efficiency of healthcare facilities by installing modern heating systems. These systems ensure uninterrupted healthcare services during winter and potential blackouts, providing a stable and safe environment for patients.
Ukraine’s Minister of Health, Dr. Victor Liashko, stated the importance of these heating systems that enable their hospitals to continue operation. Dr Emanuele Bruni, WHO Incident Manager in Ukraine added that the availability of high-quality health services and medicines offers a sense of security and normalcy. The German Ambassador to Ukraine emphasized the commitment of Germany to strengthen the long-term resilience of Ukraine’s health system. The Government of Germany is providing a generous financial support for this project.
As part of a larger initiative to install eight units, two modular heating units have been installed this week in hospitals in the Chernihiv region. These units serve as alternative heating systems for the entire hospital and are crucial for over 54,000 people across multiple districts in the Chernihiv region.
The first installation was in the Kharkiv region, where public infrastructure is at high risk of continued attacks. Another unit is being installed in the Odessa region, and four more are in the preparation stage.
Each installation requires significant infrastructure work to connect it with the entire hospital system. Hospitals can choose between firewood heating and pellet systems, depending on their preferences and available fuel types. Firewood heating units are cheaper and simpler but require manual fuel loading and large storage space. In contrast, pellet systems are fully automated, more powerful, require less storage space, and have a longer burning period.
Source: WHO
Since 10 May, at least 1,448 of the relocated people have been accommodated in 41 collective centers in Kharkiv City and oblast, according to the CCCM Cluster assessment. Prior to partner engagement at the collective and transit sites, six partners are conducting rapid assessments in collaboration with the Health Cluster and the Department of Health.
Five Health Cluster partners, including Alliance for Public Health (APH), FHI 360, International Rescue Committee (IRC), Premiere Urgence Internationale (PUI), and Stellar Ukraine, continue to provide health services at the Kharkiv City Transit Center daily based on the site calendar established by the Health Cluster to support and complement the national health authorities’ response.
As of 22 May, health partners have provided primary health care services to 935 people and provided some 529 people, including 153 children, with MHPSS consultations, focusing on the needs of vulnerable people at the Kharkiv City Transit Center.
Four mobile teams—consisting of general practitioners, nurses, psychologists (including pediatric psychologists), and social workers—have been deployed by health partners at the Transit Center. Their services encompass emergency medical care, primary health care and MHPSS consultations, and medication distribution/refills. The fifth mobile clinic present at the transit center offers laboratory and X-ray services.
To enhance awareness of public health risks at the transit center, partners have disseminated RCCE materials from the RCCE TWG, validated by the Ministry of Health (MoH). Six informative posters on Hepatitis A and Cholera have been displayed, and 3000 leaflets on intestinal infections, botulism, and hepatitis A are being distributed by partners.
Partners Medicos del Mundo (MdM Spain), PUI, and Stellar Ukraine mobile units are delivering primary health care and MHPSS services at 10 assessed collective sites. PUI has distributed hygiene and dignity kits to four different collective centers, along with specialized supplies for people with disabilities.
The Health Cluster is collaborating with the Protection Cluster to address needs at collective centers, ensuring access to nearby health facilities and family doctors, and accessibility to facilities and information on health services for people with specific needs. Hostilities across Kharkivska Oblast continue unabated, with daily reports of civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. Since 9 May, five attacks in Kharkiv city have claimed the lives of 18 people and injured at least 60.
The Health Cluster is in regular contact with the Departement of Health to provide the necessary support to complement the authorities' response. As of May 22, no additional needs have been communicated regarding the emergency response to missile attacks.
The repeated attacks on energy infrastructure have severely impacted the power supply in Kharkivska Oblast, prompting suppliers to announce additional outages.
Source: Health Cluster, WHO
There are some towns that Ukraine can just never afford to lose, and Lyptsi is one of them.
But the grip the nation keeps is tenuous: The streets are aflame from an airstrike moments earlier when we race in, under the cover of darkness. Night affords them the only respite from drone assault; the hours before we arrive have seen the town hit eight times.
Yet the soldiers of the 13th Khartiia National Guard have to endure, as the stakes here are huge. Russia’s relentless onslaught has a key goal: If they take Lyptsi, then they can position artillery within range of Ukraine’s second city, Kharkiv, 20 minutes down the road.
Down in a bunker, Oleksandr, a commander, looks at one of his many drone feeds. “You saw yourself how everything is burning. It is like that every night.”
His men were among the first to tackle Russia’s new advance into Kharkiv region nearly two weeks ago. He says they are fighting trained professional soldiers.
His stare lengthens when asked about what fortifications were in place before the surprise Russian attack. “Nothing was prepared here. Nothing. Just nothing. All the positions are being built by the hands of infantry.”
Outside, the night is shaken by more blasts. “Three weeks ago the civilians were living a peaceful life here. Rebuilding, everything was all right,” he says. “And now most of the houses are ruined.”
All around the city of Kharkiv, home to an estimated million civilians, Ukrainian forces are trying to hold back a persistent Russian assault from multiple angles. Over a week reporting in the villages around the city, CNN saw Ukrainian units holding their positions at great peril and risk, and sometimes using aged and scant artillery to fend off a much better equipped Russian force, able to thwart their most basic maneuvers with huge numbers of drones.
At one position closer to the Russian border, the 92nd Assault Brigade showed CNN a Russian artillery gun, captured in the first days of the war, from which they are now firing French mortar shells. The gun was partially hidden by a wire net, aimed at providing some protection from an attack drone. Yet above, an unidentified scout drone began to hover, forcing the unit to run into a bunker.
Another unit is forced to use a Soviet artillery gun made in the 1940s. Hidden in dense foliage, its metal is rusty in parts, limiting how often it can be fired. Artun, their commander, uses newer Polish shells, but now only fires 10 a day, when in the autumn it was 100.
Drones are “a big problem,” Artun says. “I have shrapnel in me as a keepsake,” he adds, referring to the remnants of a Russian Lancet drone still in his hand and stomach, which the surgeons could not remove. “But there are certain actions that can save you from drones.”
One of them springs into life: an alert from a $30 frequency scanner on his webbing. It has picked up the approach of another Orlan drone, sending Artun into the bunker. He looks out into the sky above, and sees it pass overhead. He commands a diverse unit, epitomizing the manpower challenges Ukraine is facing in its third year of war. Some, like him, are wounded infantrymen, put on the guns further back from the front. Others are older, while one of his team is on his first day in artillery.
For nearly two years, Kharkiv thought the threat from its neighbour had passed. A lightning Russian retreat in late 2022 left Kharkiv region peaceful and the launchpad for Ukrainian attacks across the border into Russia proper. Attacks persisted in the distance however, keeping the city’s residents awake through violently loud nights, now amplified by the threat of Russian artillery edging closer. Flares, anti-aircraft fire, and blasts regularly punctuate the enforced blackout, as Russian drones, rockets and airstrikes hit targets in the dark.
On Wednesday, city officials reported an attack on a gas station, which left four people in hospital. On Sunday, two missiles struck a lakeside resort in Cherkaska Lozova, outside the city — a horrifying attack on a civilian target which also used a “double-tap” tactic, in which a second missile hit 10 minutes after the first, injuring first responders.
A few hours after Sunday’s blasts, rescue workers clambered over the ruins of a waterside terrace, retrieving two bodies from the seven who died in the attack. One was a woman, seven months pregnant. Another was only found later, their body fragments in the wreckage. As police combed the eviscerated terrace on the lake for evidence, another air alert sounded, causing half the workers to flee for cover, and some to carry on, almost oblivious.
Source: CNN
OHCHR spokesperson Elizabeth Throssell gave this UN briefing at the Palais des Nations in Geneva.
Testimonies gathered by the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) highlight the terrifying impact on civilians of the recent escalation in hostilities in the north-east of the country, where Russian armed forces have seized control of several villages.
People who have fled from these areas along the Kharkiv region frontline described having to shelter for days in cold, dark basements, with no electricity amid intense aerial bombardment, strikes by drones and missiles, and artillery shelling.
There has been massive destruction of people’s homes and other civilian infrastructure. Entire communities have been uprooted and destroyed, with more than 10,000 people displaced to date.
According to HRMMU, at least 35 civilians have been killed and 137 injured in the Kharkiv region since Russian armed forces launched their cross-border offensive on 10 May. Of those killed or injured in the northern part of the region, which has seen the heaviest fighting, more than half were over the age of 60. This reflects the disproportionate number of older people in border and frontline areas, who, in many cases, were either unable or unwilling to leave their homes even amid a fast-deteriorating security situation.
Since 10 May, our HRMMU teams have interviewed 90 displaced civilians and have visited several sites that were struck.
Some were unable to reach shelters or even get to a basement. People described seeing their neighbours killed or injured.
Some said the situation was so bad they decided to risk walking for several kilometres to reach an evacuation point.
Local authorities and volunteers have taken major risks to help vulnerable people to get to safety. On 16 May, two medical workers, two ambulance drivers and a local official were injured while they were trying to get civilians out of the village of Buhaivka.
On the morning of 19 May, Russian armed forces struck a recreation centre in the village of Cherkaska Lozova near Kharkiv city. Less than 20 minutes later, the site was hit again when police and medical workers were already on the scene to assist the victims. HRMMU monitors visited the location and documented the deaths of at least six civilians, with dozens of people injured.
Many of those evacuated from Vovchansk and other areas have arrived in Kharkiv city, which also remains under attack. In Kharkiv, there were multiple missile strikes on Thursday, reportedly killing seven civilians and injuring 21 others.
We call again on the Russian Federation to strictly respect all the rules of international law relating to the conduct of hostilities, and to cease its attacks on Ukraine immediately.
In the third year of the Russian Federation’s full-scale armed attack on Ukraine, with no end in sight, lives, homes, and futures continue to be destroyed. The long-term impact of this war in Ukraine will be felt for generations, with the task of rebuilding shattered communities, already a massive undertaking, growing larger with every further day of violence and destruction.
Source: OHCHR
The Institute on the Study of War (ISW) presented an analysis of the escalation of the Russian offensive in the past several months. A principal reason was the delay in the Western aid to Ukraine that gave Russia the opportunity to mount an aggressive offense. The ISW has tracked the progression of the conflict during this time when Ukraine was unable to respond appropriately to the Russian aggression.
Below are highlights of that analysis. Details may be accessed from the provided link.
May 22, 2024
Ukraine and the West have defeated a months-long Russian effort to persuade the West to abandon Ukraine and set conditions to collapse Ukrainian defenses.
Russian forces have conducted offensive operations since Fall 2023 that aimed to convince the West to abandon its commitment to Ukraine, and prolonged US debates about security assistance likely convinced the Kremlin that its efforts had partially succeeded. The effects of continued delays in US and Western security assistance set conditions for Russian forces to make more significant gains on the battlefield than they had previously been able to make. The Russian military command likely concluded that Russian forces would be able to collapse the Ukrainian frontline at some point in the near to medium term.
October and November 2023
Russia fails to seize Avdiivka but does seize the theater-wide initiative.
Russian forces launched localized offensive operations throughout eastern Ukraine in the Fall of 2023 in an effort to seize the theater-wide initiative and convince the West that the war was "stalemated" and that continued support for Ukraine was futile. Russian forces had successfully defended against the Summer 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive
Russian forces initially sought to conduct a rapid operational encirclement of Avdiivka in October 2023 to demoralize the West and quickly force Ukraine to cede the theater-wide initiative but failed to do so.
Russian forces conducted mass mechanized assaults in the Avdiivka area from October 10 to October 16, shortly after the tempo of the Ukrainian counteroffensive in western Zaporizhia Oblast had begun to slow in September.
December 2023
An increasingly confident Kremlin
The Kremlin likely became convinced by mid-winter that it had succeeded in weakening Western support for Ukraine. Putin and the Kremlin had cautiously discussed the war in public for much of the full-scale invasion and only briefly touched on their strategic goals for the war.[20] Putin and the Kremlin notably shifted their public rhetoric in December, however, reengaging with expansionist rhetoric.
Russian forces began preparations for intensified offensive efforts in Ukraine in December 2023 and early January 2024 that indicated that the Russian military command likely assessed that tactically and operationally significant gains were possible. Russian sources claimed in early January that Russian forces were preparing to launch a new offensive effort once the ground froze in eastern Ukraine.
January and February 2024
Russian forces intensify offensive efforts and pursue more operationally significant gains
Russian forces significantly intensified offensive operations around Avdiivka and launched their Winter-Spring 2024 offensive operation on the Kharkiv-Luhansk axis roughly at the same time in mid-January. Russian forces intensified their use of armored vehicles to transport infantry to the frontline near Avdiivka on January 16 and reportedly entered Avdiivka as of January 19.
Russian forces concentrated significant manpower and materiel on their effort to seize Avdiivka in mid-February and achieved their tactical objective in the area at high cost. Russian forces made tactical gains in northern Avdiivka between February 2 and 8.
March and April 2024
Russia sees opportunities for the destabilization and collapse of the Ukrainian defense.
The Russian seizure of Avdiivka prominently highlighted the way in which Ukrainian materiel constraints were facilitating Russian advances, and the Russian military command likely saw prospects for destabilizing Ukrainian defenses on a larger scale following the seizure of Avdiivka. Russian forces conducted upwards of 100 glide bomb strikes against Avdiivka per day in the final weeks of the offensive effort to seize the settlement.
Russian forces also began approaching the outskirts of Chasiv Yar in March, setting conditions to pursue an operationally significant objective west of Bakhmut.
Russian forces intensified mechanized assaults throughout eastern Ukraine in late March and early April and increased their general offensive tempo into April in order to destabilize the Ukrainian defense further.
Russian forces also resumed efforts to collapse Ukraine's energy grid in late March, likely viewing degrading Ukrainian air defense capabilities as an opportunity to cause significant long-term damage to Ukrainian war fighting capabilities and set conditions for significant gains on the battlefield.
May 2024 and Beyond
A closing window for Russian tactical gains and the approaching Russian summer offensive effort
The resumption of US security assistance to Ukraine at the end of April was a critical turning point in the war and created a limited window for Russian forces to pursue tactically significant gains. It will still take several weeks for US security assistance to arrive to Ukrainian forces at the front at scale, and Russian forces have intensified offensive operations in certain sectors and maintained their offensive tempo in others to take advantage of the limited window before the large-scale arrival of new US aid at the front.
Russian forces launched limited offensive operations along the Russian-Ukrainian border in northern Kharkiv Oblast on May 10 and may have started the operation earlier than intended due to the resumption of US security assistance.
The Russian military command likely envisioned that simultaneous offensive efforts towards Kharkiv City and along the current frontline in eastern Ukraine would stretch and overwhelm poorly-provisioned and undermanned Ukrainian forces and allow Russian forces to achieve a major breakthrough in at least one sector of the frontline.
The past seven months of fighting have likely solidified Putin's calculus that he can continue gradual creeping advances in Ukraine without the threat of a significant Ukrainian counteroffensive operation. Ukrainian forces have not regained tactically significant territory from Russian forces since Russian forces resumed offensive operations in October 2023, and Ukrainian tactical counterattacks have largely only staved off further Russian gains.
Russian efforts to convince the West to abandon Ukraine are not over. Recent months have proven to Russia that morale is Ukraine's and the West's center of gravity in this war. While Ukrainian morale has held firm, the weakening of Western morale and support for Ukraine quickly began to express itself on the battlefield and created conditions that convinced Russia that operationally significant gains were possible.
Source: ISW
The Independent Commission for Aid Impact works to improve the quality of UK development assistance through robust, independent scrutiny. We provide assurance to the UK taxpayer by conducting independent reviews of the effectiveness and value for money of UK aid. It operates independently of government, reporting to Parliament, and its mandate covers all UK official development assistance.
UK aid to Ukraine has been fast, flexible and responsive but post-war reconstruction will need careful management.
Summary
ICAI finds the UK mounted an effective and flexible civilian aid response to the crisis in Ukraine, including bilateral aid of £228m and a 5-year commitment of £4 billion in loan guarantees.
Strong efforts to ensure aid reaches vulnerable groups such as the elderly, women and those with disabilities.
More humanitarian aid should be channelled through Ukrainian civil society organisations, watchdog says.
UK has sought support for Ukraine from other countries and the private sector, including through the Ukraine Recovery Conference in London.
ICAI warns the UK aid programme must prepare for and manage corruption risks, especially with post-war reconstruction.
The UK mounted a rapid and effective aid response after the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, but corruption remains a significant risk to future reconstruction, a new report from the aid watchdog finds today (Tuesday 30 April).
Alongside the UK’s military assistance, the civilian aid response spent approximately £228 million on bilateral aid in Ukraine in 2023-24, making it now the UK’s largest country programme. The UK also agreed to provide $5 billion (£4 billion) in guarantees, as part of an international package to enable Ukraine to access World Bank lending – meaning the UK agrees to pay should Ukraine default on these loans.
The guarantees enable Ukraine to continue to fund public services and social programmes. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) currently imposes a 25% single country risk-adjusted exposure limit for loan guarantees – meaning one country shouldn’t receive more than 25% of the UK’s loan guarantees globally – but an exception has been made for Ukraine, which now accounts for 82%.
The Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) review found that the UK’s swiftly mobilised humanitarian assistance – including medical supplies and donated ambulances, food and support packages for displaced refugees – was rapid, flexible and well-targeted.
The loan guarantees have also been critical in allowing Ukraine to continue to function as a state and withstand the pressures of war, the report adds. However, these come with large contingent liabilities which pose risks to the wider UK aid programme in future years should Ukraine be unable to repay the debt.
ICAI also notes that high risks of fraud and corruption commonly found in reconstruction efforts pose a threat to Ukraine’s long-term recovery and will need careful management by the UK and other countries.
ICAI Commissioner Sir Hugh Bayley, who led the review, said:
“The UK has delivered an impressive humanitarian response to the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, mobilising aid swiftly to meet Ukraine’s needs. Ukraine’s civil society groups have been essential to aid delivery and more UK aid should be channelled through them.
“UK loan guarantees have provided much greater support than traditional aid funding would allow, although this brings a large longer-term financial risk. Corruption also remains a significant issue in Ukraine, especially for reconstruction contracts, and the UK must address these risks in its plans to support Ukraine to rebuild.”
With a third of the Ukrainian population displaced by the war and 17 million people in need of humanitarian assistance, ICAI found that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) acted quickly following the full-scale invasion, giving aid to trusted partners who could establish a swift response to the crisis. The watchdog praises the UK’s proactive approach to ensuring vulnerable groups such as the elderly and those with disabilities were supported, through identifying gaps and providing specific contributions for these groups.
ICAI reports that civil society groups in Ukraine play a crucial part in the delivery of humanitarian assistance and found a need for improvements in how the global community, including the UK, works with and funds these groups. Some local organisations told ICAI that strict conditions attached to international aid made it difficult for them to access the funds they needed.
On preventing fraud and corruption, the report found FCDO had correctly identified the risk of aid being diverted from its intended purpose as being high in Ukraine – as would be expected in such a context – but was limited in its ability to monitor these risks due to capacity of the team and security constraints, relying heavily on organisations such as the World Bank’s audit processes.
The aid watchdog also found that the UK’s efforts to support Ukraine have been based on significant engagement with the country’s government, deep knowledge of the national context and expertise drawn from other operations around the world over the last 20 years. Ukraine’s stabilisation and emergence from the war as a thriving, democratic country is a key foreign policy priority for the UK and its Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU) has helped build Ukrainian resilience and remain adaptive in the changing environment.
The report notes that the breadth of UK aid to Ukraine has balanced the UK’s strategic objectives with Ukraine’s evolving needs. Many activities reflect the UK’s commitments in its recent White Paper on International Development, including the inclusion of women’s organisations in long-term reconstruction planning and support for human rights, the rule of law and investigative assistance for war crimes accountability.
The Ukraine Recovery Conference, hosted in London in June 2023, generated an impressive amount of energy around looking ahead to Ukraine’s reconstruction and the involvement of private sector investment, but with the conflict still ongoing some private sector stakeholders ICAI spoke to suggested a focus on emergency needs such as infrastructure repairs was more realistic in the short term.
ICAI makes the following recommendations:
Recommendation 1: FCDO should intensify its support for localisation of the coordination and delivery of the humanitarian response in Ukraine.
Recommendation 2: The design of future FCDO programmes should encompass programming options for different scenarios and the ability to adapt quickly when circumstances change.
Recommendation 3: FCDO should strengthen its third-party monitoring and audit arrangements in Ukraine by adding specialist capacity to identify and investigate fraud, corruption and diversion risks to UK aid (including guarantees) across the country portfolio.
Recommendation 4: Based on lessons from other post-conflict settings, FCDO’s new anti-corruption programming should include a focus on helping Ukraine’s independent anti-corruption bodies to identify and manage corruption risks associated with large-scale reconstruction.
Source: ICAI
The United States is expected to announce an additional $275 million in military aid for Ukraine on Friday as Kyiv struggles to hold off advances by Russian troops in the Kharkiv region, two U.S. officials say.
This will be the fourth installment of military aid for Ukraine since Congress passed a long-delayed foreign aid bill late last month and comes as the Biden administration has pledged to keep weapons flowing regularly and to get them to the front lines as quickly as possible.
The package includes high mobility artillery rocket systems, or HIMARS, munitions as well 155 mm and 105 mm high-demand artillery rounds, according to the two U.S. officials. Additional items in the aid package include Javelin and AT-4 anti-tank systems; anti-tank mines, tactical vehicles, small arms and ammunition for those weapons, one of the officials said. Both officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details of the aid package before the public announcement.
It follows a monthly gathering Monday of about 50 defense leaders from Europe and elsewhere who meet regularly to coordinate getting more military aid to Ukraine. At this latest meeting, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said Ukraine was in a “moment of challenge” due to Russia’s new onslaught on Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city. He pledged to keep weapons moving “week after week.”
Source: AP News
Foreign ministers confident of agreement to use bank assets as security for Ukraine reconstruction loan. Hopes of a multi-country deal to use $300bn of Russian state assets frozen in the European banking system to support Ukraine have grown after it emerged that G7 ministers were confident of overcoming technical and political obstacles at a meeting in northern Italy on Saturday.
The Canadian finance minister, Chrystia Freeland, said she was optimistic that G7 leaders would reach an agreement, as support coalesced around a plan to use frozen Russian central bank assets as security for a $50bn (£39bn) loan.
Finance ministers from the Group of Seven nations gathered in Stresa, Italy, have been in discussions to thrash out a plan to present to national leaders for final agreement at a summit in mid-June.
About $300bn (£235bn) belonging to the Russian central bank has been frozen in the west, largely in foreign currency, gold and government bonds. About 70% of this is held in the Belgian central securities depository Euroclear, which is holding the equivalent of £162bn.
The US is estimated to have $40bn-$60bn worth of Russian assets, and the UK closer to £25bn, but no official figure has been disclosed.
Ukraine has been pushing for access to the funds to help finance the reconstruction of its battered infrastructure, freeing up other loans and grants to buy extra weaponry in the war with Russia. Russia recently opened a new front north of Kharkiv and consolidated its position in the south, thwarting Ukrainian advances.
The British foreign secretary, David Cameron, has previously said the UK was in favour of lending Ukraine the entire sum on the basis that Russia will be forced to pay reparations at the end of the war.
Campaigners say all of the funds should be confiscated in order to send a message to Moscow that its war would be met with overwhelming support for Ukraine.
However, European governments, including the UK, have balked at the plan, initially arguing that they could only justify using the interest generated by the Russian assets, amounting to about €2.5bn-€3bn (£2.1bn-£2.6bn) a year.
Under an agreement reached last week by EU member states, 90% of the interest proceeds would go into an EU-run fund to be spent supporting Ukraine’s military, with the other 10% going to other forms of support. The EU expects the assets to yield about €15bn-€20bn in profits by 2027. Ukraine is expected to receive the first tranche in July, EU diplomats have said.
A US plan to leverage all the funds to support a loan has gained traction, though many of the technical issues, including how the loan’s sponsoring countries would allocate funds for projects, had yet to be resolved before the finance ministers’ meeting.
A group of international lawyers has given an opinion that confiscation could be carried out within existing legal frameworks, arguing that Russia’s attack was a breach of international law and justified reparations worth at least the cost of the damage inflicted on Ukraine, which according to World Bank estimates is $480bn (£377bn).
The US Treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, has suggested that a $50bn loan is possible using Russia’s funds as collateral, in addition to the EU plan, giving Ukraine a generous lifeline that would take effect regardless of the outcome of the US presidential election later this year.
Freeland said the group was working on a “collaborative approach” where all partners could find agreement.
Source: The Guardian
The European Union (EU) has provided €2.5 million to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), as part of efforts to bolster access to education and overcome learning gaps, as well as support immunization for children in the East and South of Ukraine.
“UNICEF expresses its sincere gratitude to the European Union for its unwavering support and solidarity in providing Ukrainian children with access to education and healthcare services,” said Munir Mammadzade, UNICEF Representative to Ukraine. “Through collaborative efforts, UNICEF continues its work to ensure that despite the challenges of the war, every child has the opportunity to thrive.”
The EU funding will help UNICEF to refurbish and rehabilitate shelters ducation institutions to provide safe and conducive spaces for learning, as well as to conduct catch-up classes to children at risk of learning losses. In addition, teachers and educators will be empowered through training initiatives, enabling them to effectively deliver catch-up learning interventions and support the educational needs of vulnerable children.
This funding will also be channeled to improve access of children and adults to routine vaccination in Eastern regions, facilitating the procurement of cold chain equipment and upgrading storage capacities to streamline the delivery of routine vaccinations for children and adults.
“The war in Ukraine has significantly restricted the access to education and health services for numerous Ukrainian children,” stated Claudia Amaral, Head of the European Union Humanitarian Aid in Ukraine. “The European Union is fully committed to providing immediate assistance to the children of Ukraine, as they are one of the most vulnerable groups. We work hand in hand with humanitarian organizations like UNICEF to guarantee that children can reach their potential even amidst difficult circumstances.”
Since the beginning of the full-scale war in Ukraine began in February 2022, the EU has allocated over €53 million to support UNICEF Ukraine through the European Commission’s Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations department. This support aimed to ensure emergency and early recovery interventions for children’s access to health, nutrition, education, child protection, cash assistance and safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). Nearly 2 million people have already benefited from UNICEF’s support funded by the EU.
Source: UNICEF
Let us pray for peace. We need peace. The world is at war. Let us not forget tormented Ukraine, which is suffering a great deal. Let us not forget Palestine and Israel: may it stop, this war. Let us not forget Myanmar. And let us not forget the many countries at war. Brothers and sisters, we must prayer for peace in this time of war all over the world.
E preghiamo per la pace. Abbiamo bisogno di pace. Il mondo è in guerra. Non dimentichiamo la martoriata Ucraina che sta soffrendo tanto. Non dimentichiamo la Palestina e Israele: che si fermi, questa guerra. Non dimentichiamo il Myanmar. E non dimentichiamo tanti Paesi in guerra. Fratelli e sorelle, bisogna pregare per la pace in questo tempo di guerra mondiale.
Links to the full text in ENGLISH and ITALIANPope meets with Ukrainian and Palestinian children
Pope Francis: World needs peace in this time of war
Pope prays Holy Spirit may create harmony for world peace
Ukraine Evacuating Children As Russian Forces Approach Kharkiv
Father Roman Lagish: the community saves refugees from dangers abroad (Google translate)
«Heroes Who Died for Ukraine Change the Ukrainian Mindset,» His Beatitude Sviatoslav
In Palermo, Bishop Honcharuk thanked for the help to Ukraine (Google translate)
Orthopedic resident of the National Institute of Medicine's Orthopedic clinic in Kyiv, receiving a portable ultrasound machine, donated by Ms. Erica Smith of Hospital Sisters' Mission Outreach. ©ICMC